Osborne’s recovery is an illusion, women still feel the pinch
Osborne's Autumn Financial Statement neglects women's struggles, lacks social service investment, exacerbates income inequality.
Open Letter
Redundancy protection: pregnant women and new mothers
Dear Secretary of State,
Redundancy protection: pregnant women and new mothers
We are writing to urge you to act swiftly on the Women & Equalities Committee’s recommendation, in its report published on 9 February – that the Government “introduce legislation in this Parliamentary session to extend redundancy protection to pregnant women and new mothers” – by adopting Maria Miller’s Pregnancy & Maternity (Redundancy Protection) Bill, introduced in July last year, and expediting it through Parliament using Government time.
In its report, the Committee concludes:
“We are gravely concerned by evidence detailing potentially unlawful and discriminatory practices towards pregnant women and those on maternity leave during the pandemic. This should have been better anticipated by the Government at the beginning of the pandemic, and preventative actions taken. It cannot be allowed to continue. The Government must act now to prevent further discrimination, particularly as we enter a time of potentially unprecedented job losses, to which pregnant women and new mothers may be particularly vulnerable.”
The Government has stated that it plans to extend the period covered by the existing, so-called Regulation 10 protections for women on maternity leave in its promised but still awaited Employment Bill. However, as Mrs Miller noted when introducing her Bill on 8 July, extending the period covered by those provisions “would simply entrench a system that we know does not work”. For we know that, due to the uncertainty of success and the substantial financial cost of bringing an employment tribunal claim for breach of Regulation 10, very few women do so. Those legal costs can easily exceed £10,000, and in 2019/20 the median tribunal award for sex discrimination was just £14,073. In short, women do the maths.
This leaves employers free to ignore or evade their obligations under Regulation 10 with near impunity. And simply extending the period for which Regulation 10 applies, so as to cover from pregnancy to six months after return to work, as the Government plans to do, would not address this fundamental flaw.
As you know, Mrs Miller’s Bill would replace these ineffective legal provisions with a new legal framework, also covering from pregnancy to six months after return to work, under which it would be unlawful to make a pregnant woman or new mother redundant, other than in very limited and specified circumstances, such as the closure of the business. And, by ensuring near certainty of success for any subsequent – thereby less costly – employment tribunal claim, this would create a strong disincentive to discriminatory practice by employers.
In addition to the 21 co-signatories of this letter, Mrs Miller’s Bill is supported by the Equality & Human Rights Commission, and by the College of Podiatry, the Fire Brigades Union, the FDA, the Public & Commercial Services union (PCS), and Usdaw. The Bill is short and, as illustrated by the Ministerial & Other Maternity Allowances Bill, the Government is perfectly able to expedite such Bills through Parliament when it recognises a need to do so.
Accordingly, we hope that you and Cabinet colleagues will now act swiftly upon the recommendation of the Women & Equalities Committee, by adopting Mrs Miller’s Bill as your own and speeding it into law.
Yours faithfully,
Ros Bragg, Director, Maternity Action
Mick Whelan ,General Secretary, ASLEF
Karen Middleton CBE, Chief Executive, Chartered Society of Physiotherapy
Lauren Crowley, Head of Equalities, Community
Ali Harris, Chief Executive Officer, Equally Ours
Felicia Willow, Interim CEO, The Fawcett Society
Victoria Benson, Chief Executive, Gingerbread
Julie Bishop, Director, Law Centres Network
Angela McConville, Chief Executive, NCT
Dr Mary Bousted & Kevin Courtney, Joint General Secretaries, National Education Union
Joeli Brearley, Founder & CEO, Pregnant Then Screwed
Gill Walton, Chief Executive, Royal College of Midwives
Mick Cash, General Secretary, RMT
Frances O’Grady, General Secretary, TUC
Christina McAnea, General Secretary, UNISON
Diana Holland, Assistant General Secretary (Equalities), Unite the union
Dr Jo Grady, General Secretary, University & College Union
Dr Mary-Ann Stephenson, Director, Women’s Budget Group
Jane van Zyl, Chief Executive Officer, Working Families
Karen Teago, Chief Executive Officer, YESS Law
Joe Levenson, Director of Communications & Campaigns, Young Women’s Trust
Osborne's Autumn Financial Statement neglects women's struggles, lacks social service investment, exacerbates income inequality.
The proposed Transferable Tax Allowance disproportionately benefits men, widens the income gap in married couples, and neglects the poorest families.
While physical infrastructure receives attention, there's a lack of focus on affordable housing, disproportionately affecting women.
Budget 2014: The government is taking money from women to fund tax breaks for men – new analysis from the Women’s Budget Group