Who loses from benefit uprating changes? A gendered analysis
WBG's series on the gendered impact of the cost-of-living crisis: A gendered analysis of benefit uprating changes
UK Policy Briefing
Our series of briefings on the gender impact of policy in 12 distinct areas ahead of the Autumn Budget 2017.
• The government spends £9 billion a year on tax reliefs for non-pension saving and this is expected to have risen by almost another £1 billion since the introduction of the Lifetime ISA. This is a regressive use of taxpayers’ money that only benefits people who can, in any case, afford to save.
• Evidence shows that women, once they have children, are more likely than men to have little or nothing in the way of savings and investments. This is due to both immediate and persistent effects of the work-life balance they must typically juggle in order to care for children and also frail adult family members.
• The £9 to £10 billion for savings-related tax reliefs would be better spent on improving the provision of affordable, good quality childcare, promoting flexible working in higher-paid jobs and measures that foster a move away from the current gendered distribution of unpaid work.
WBG's series on the gendered impact of the cost-of-living crisis: A gendered analysis of benefit uprating changes
We urge the Chancellor to increase benefits in line with September CPI inflation as previously planned in his Autumn Statement.
WBG Spring Statement Response March 2022
Ahead of the 2018 Autumn Budget, we’ve put together a briefing on public transport and gender.